Is Hire Purchase car finance still fit for purpose?

Hire Purchase (HP), as a way of spreading the cost of a purchase, was conceived in England in the late 1800’s, well before the first mass-produced Model T Ford in 1908.

A hundred plus years on and we’ve seen a bit of polishing along the way, and a few variants – most recently Personal Contract Plans (PCP) – however it remains basically the same.

In an age of transparency and simplicity, it seems a bit old hat.

It’s not easily explained to a consumer that HP is car finance, not a loan, but kind of like a loan. And surely eyes have glazed over by the time it’s clear that the consumer doesn’t own the car, nor repays the finance – they pay a rental – and then the half and third rules, merchantable quality, early settlement fees and maybe what a balloon is. Seems a tough way to explain that if you buy a car on HP and you do not fully pay for it, you might need to give it back.

That got me thinking…

At the moment we have a product that somehow has survived the ages, yet seems to be unliked by both lenders and consumers. Is it still fit for purpose?

Should we just start again and create a new ‘consumer friendly’ product that is part of the car buying journey. With one click the vehicle title could pass straight from a consumer to a lender. Maybe a combination of big data, AI, and a verified digital car buying journey is the answer?

Sounding simple and transparent?

Published On: November 10, 2020
A technology solution connecting brands and banks, enabling brands to quickly launch consumer lending.
For Brands…

Build financial products into your brand with access to our technology and marketplace of lenders.

For Lenders…

Work with brands to scale consumer lending, generating new revenue opportunities.

For Developers…

Easy integrations options available, including a world class API suite and a team to support you.